…a developmental psychologist.
…a once-successful factory owner.
…an industrialist.
…an agricultural engineer.
…a teacher and school principal.
…a former social worker.
…an optometrist.
What do they have in common?
They’re members of the same Faith, they’ve been in prison for many months, and they’re going to trial next week with no access to legal counsel.
The charges?
“…espionage for Israel, insulting religious sanctities, and propaganda against the Islamic republic”.
What country is this occurring in?
Iran.
Statements by U.S. Government and NGOs
February 13, 2009
USCIRF calls for justice for Baha’i prisoners in Iran
Statement from the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom
Congressional Record – February 11, 2009
Representative Frank R. Wolf expressed concern over the upcoming trial of the seven Baha’i leaders
Amnesty International Urgent Action
Amnesty International has launched an urgent action update exclusively devoted to the latest news about the Baha’i leaders in Iran.
Institute condemns charges and upcoming trial against the Baha’i leaders in Iran
The Institute for Religion and Public Policy issued this statement on February 12, 2009
Baha’i “Spying” Case Strikes New Blow Against Religious Freedom in Iran
Freedom House strongly condemns the Iranian government’s decision to try 7 Baha’is next week
Media Coverage
February 12, 2009
World Briefing – Middle East – Iran – 7 Bahais to Face Trial
The New York Times
Baha’i Leaders In Iran Charged With Spying For Israel
RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty, Czech Republic
Iran Announces Trial of Baha’i Leadership
7thSpace Interactive
Baha’i Leaders In Iran Charged With Spying For Israel
Payvand, Iran
February 11, 2009
Iran to try Bahais for spying for Israel
Agence France Presse – AFP
Iran charges 7 members of Baha’i faith with spying for Israel
Ha’aretz, Israel
Iran vows to try 7 Baha’i leaders as spies
Times Colonist, Canada
Obama’s Two Iran Tests
Michael Rubin in the corner of The National Review Online
Iran to try Bahais for spying for Israel
Human Rights Tribune, Switzerland
Iran to try seven Baha’is for “spying” for Israel
IranVNC, DC
The official response from the
Bahá’í International Community
Religious Freedom? Human Rights? Equity and Justice?
All these will be on trial with these seven persecuted people . . .
Spiritual Quote:
Agenda item 23: Implementation of the Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief
Geneva, Switzerland
17 February 1988
* * * * * * * * *
“All religions teach that we should love one another; that we should seek out our own shortcomings before we presume to condemn the faults of others; that we must not consider ourselves superior to our neighbors.”
If all people were to follow these norms, as described in the passage we have just quoted from the Bahá’í writings, religious intolerance would cease to be a blot on human affairs. The ideals of the 1981 Declaration would become a reality for the suffering victims of religious persecution.
The Bahá’í International Community believes that binding international norms protecting human rights are of great importance. We are therefore following with great interest the recent discussions in the Sub-Commission and the Commission on the possible elaboration of a binding international instrument dealing with freedom of religion or belief, inspired by the recommendations contained in Mrs. Odio Benito’s excellent study. We are convinced, however, that in this delicate process it is important not to lose sight of the standards already spelled out in the 1981 Declaration. As the Commission’s Special Rapporteur, Dr. Ribeiro, indicated in his report presented last year, these standards can be understood as moral guidelines to those states which voted in favor of the Declaration in 1981.
We also believe that it is useful to focus attention on contemporary manifestations of religious intolerance. We have therefore studied with interest Dr. Ribeiro’s latest report, hope that his mandate will once again be renewed by the Commission, and wish to underline the importance of forging a broad and non-partisan consensus on the elimination of religious intolerance.
While Dr. Ribeiro has chosen to focus on allegations of violations of religious freedom in seven countries, it is important to bear in mind that many countries suffer from the pernicious influence of religious intolerance. Efforts to implement the 1981 Declaration, and to formulate an eventual convention, must be guided by an appreciation for the universal nature of the problem.
In the Bahá’í view, a crucial means for implementing the 1981 Declaration is the development of tolerance among individuals and the abolition of religious exclusivity and fanaticism. Dr. Ribeiro has rightly pointed out that intransigent attitudes, the claim of religious believers to an absolute and exclusive hold on truth, and the denial of the right of everyone to be different are root causes of religious discrimination.
Indeed, human beings have a tendency to view their own beliefs as right, and all others as wrong. They have, we suggest, erroneously interpreted the tenets of their own faiths as advocating such exclusivity, and sometimes as giving them the right to persecute others under the banner of upholding their version of truth. The Bahá’í writings admonish humankind to abandon such intolerant attitudes and replace them with mutual respect and forbearance.
How can religious dogmatism be banished from human minds and hearts? In the first place, we believe that all the world’s major religions have proceeded from the same Source, worshipped alike by Bahá’í, Buddhist, Christian, Hindu, Jew and Moslem, as well as members of other religions. The core teachings of every religion—for example, the teaching to love one’s neighbor—are essentially the same, and we submit that they reflect one universal truth.
Understanding of this point will enable each individual, whatever his or her religion, to view other religions with due respect. This perspective fosters tolerance among people of various beliefs, despite the differences that may exist in their outward religious practices. For this reason, we welcome Dr. Ribeiro’s suggestion that interreligious dialogue should be fostered and that such discussions should aim at “emphasizing the similarities among various religions and beliefs rather than their differences.”
While believing, as part of our faith, that all the great religions are united in the fundamental principles that they espouse, the Bahá’í writings advocate the moral obligation of everyone to search for truth independently. Religions and beliefs must never be forced on people. Instead, the Bahá’í writings indicate that each individual should utilize his own powers of intellect, reason and spirit to search for truth.
The principle of independent search after truth can help to heal the wounds inflicted by intolerance in at least two important ways. On the one hand, it induces each individual to act humbly towards others, instead of with an air of superiority, and to respect their right to choose beliefs of their own as a result of their own quest for truth.
On the other hand, we believe that, if people are permitted to question the dogmas handed down over generations, and to seek truth using their own faculties of perception, they will develop a genuine appreciation for religious tolerance.
We therefore welcome initiatives designed to increase respect for different beliefs and understanding among religions. This is why, for example, the Bahá’í International Community has actively participated, along with other non-governmental organizations, in making plans for a Second International Conference on Tolerance for Diversity of Religion or Belief, scheduled to be held in Warsaw, Poland in 1989.
Bahá’í International Community, 1987 Mar 03, Eliminating Religious Intolerance
Let’s have a conversation !
You can also explore and discuss the ideas of this post at
Our Evolution‘s Forums.
Make It Easy !
Subscribe Free
in a reader or your email
For FREE Subscriptions to our monthly newsletter just send us an email at
amzolt{at}gmail{dot}com
Hi,
in history religion was always the cause of division between
humans, religion is an idelogy, that is a way of seeing and perceiving things. Since humans will not be aware of the universality of spiritualty they will never be in peace with their neighbours.
bwerner,
I agree that history shows division of human against human on religious grounds but I have more hope for the future–when we can see that the “spirituality” behind all true “religions” is in truth the Same, religious violence will cease…
We can and should build millions of elementary schools all over the earth and insure that every child recieves at least an elementary education. These schools should teach a universal language so that everyone can understand and communicate with each other.
Religions is an inherent attribute of human nature and should be taught in all the worlds schools. A text book would include chapters about all the world’s religions, written from the perspective of each religion.
UNESCO would be the most appropriate organization to execute such an international teaching program.
Thanks
Bob
Bob,
Pure Wisdom !!!
Danger is a perception. As you grow in consciousness, you move beyond self-created limitation.
Liara,
Might I offer the opinion that not all perceptions are “self-created limitations”…
The ego guards against anything that does not preserve its own self-delusion. That is, anger or any other emotional defense make sense to ego. If a person experiences the desire to defend a position, then its useful to do nothing. To step back and notice internal impulses is to notice you are not diminished, but expanded in non-reaction. When you do not opt to strengthen a personal position, you no longer identify with form or self-image. True power lies beyond form. If you do not choose to react, you echo the Tao Te Ching which teaches how a being is restored to wholeness.
Liara,
Could you explain in more detail how your comment explains why perceptions are, in your estimation, always self-limiting–if that is what the current comment is intended to do…..?
One dictionary defines perception as a means to apprehend information based on your senses and impressions of the mind. As the human mind interprets experiences based on what you have seen, been told or experienced, then your mind anticipates based on what it has perceived, on what it believes it is perceiving or what has been described as having been perceived. This is a sample comfort zone. The concept of danger is something each person understands based on what he has seen, heard, experienced or imagined in some other way. One perspective is that the mind creates a mental image of danger limited by such parameters. In such a case, only the process of peeling away the layers of created detail would you arrive at the formless state of nothingness where danger does not exist.
Liara,
Thanks for that more detailed explanation of your reasoning…
Pingback: The World Is Watching… « Our Evolution